Custom JSON-LD vocabulary terms (classes and properties) used by the graph.jsonld knowledge graphs of the shimo4228 program, with hub-level concept instances. Lightweight ontology: RDFS plus schema.org domainIncludes/rangeIncludes; no OWL axioms.
ADR
アーキテクチャ意思決定記録
An Architecture Decision Record published by a program repository (a line or an ecosystem repo).
Artifact
生成アーティファクト
A generated output of the Contemplative Agent distill pipeline (extracted skills, distilled rules), produced by a DistillCommand.
Axiom
公理
One of the four contemplative axioms (mindfulness, emptiness, non-duality, boundless care) the Contemplative Agent line adopts as behavioral constitution.
Axis
反転軸
One of Authorship Strategy's three co-varying inversion axes (scarcity to diffusion, exclusivity to derivation, enclosure to openness).
Concept
概念
A named structural concept a practice line defines (e.g. six-phase loop, three-axis inversion). Definitional authority stays in the defining line's graph.
DistillCommand
蒸留コマンド
A command of the Contemplative Agent distill pipeline (distill, distill-identity, insight, rules-distill, amend-constitution); each produces a memory layer or an artifact.
EcosystemRepo
エコシステムリポジトリ
A supporting repository (skill, dataset, tool) attached to a practice line, not itself a line.
ExternalReference
外部参照
A third-party work (paper, benchmark, standard) the program cites; never authored by the program.
Layer
判断レイヤー
One of Authorship Strategy's four judgment layers (Authenticity, Attribution Diffusion, Idea vs Scaffold, Tactics); each layer is downstream of the one above.
MemoryLayer
記憶レイヤー
A layer of the agent memory stack (episode log, knowledge, identity; the data repo adds constitution and views), ordered by level. Higher layers are write-gated by human approval.
Observation
観測
An empirical observation node recording a verified experimental result (e.g. a fine-tuning verification verdict).
Paper
論文
A standalone paper deposited from a line as its own Zenodo record; attached to its line via schema.org isPartOf.
Phase
フェーズ
A phase of a line's operating cycle, minted per line (the six AKC and Contemplative Agent cycle phases, AAP's design and operation phases).
PolicyFramework
政策フレームワーク
An external AI-governance framework (NIST AI RMF, ISO/IEC 42001, EU AI Act) that AAP decisions are mapped to.
ProhibitionLevel
禁止強度レベル
A rung of AAP's prohibition-strength hierarchy (absence, scaffolding enforcement, untrusted boundary), ordered by level and chained by strongerThan.
Quadrant
象限
One of AAP's Four Business AI Quadrants (Script, Algorithmic Search, LLM Workflow, Autonomous Agentic Loop), including LLM Workflow's conversational and batch sub-quadrants.
ResearchLine
プラクティスライン
An independently evolving, DOI-registered practice line of the program. The five instances are typed with this class in every graph. The class IRI keeps its historical name for link stability; the current human-facing term is practice line.
RetrievalView
検索ビュー
A named retrieval lens (social, communication, technical, reasoning, self-reflection, constitutional, …) over the knowledge memory layer.
Shape
ドクトリン形状
One of doctrine-corpus's four doctrine shapes (judgment, explain, definition, contrast) classifying corpus pairs; ordered by shapeOrdinal.
SnapshotTaxonomy
スナップショット分類
The taxonomy node enumerating the data repo's snapshot kinds; see snapshotKind.
Tactic
戦術
A concrete tactic of a working doctrine (e.g. the Existence Proof Format); instances are typed Concept and Tactic together.
WorkingDoctrine
ワーキングドクトリン
A pre-line working doctrine — a published, DOI-anchored doctrine repository not yet promoted to a practice line.
alignsWith
整合する
The subject ADR is consistent with and mutually reinforces the object ADR or axiom; neither supersedes the other.
appliesTo
適用対象
The subject decision, concept, or schema applies within the scope of the object (a quadrant, memory layer, or concept).
belongsToPhase
所属フェーズ
The subject ADR belongs to the object cycle phase.
characterizesPairs
ペアを特徴づける
The subject doctrine shape characterizes pairs in the object corpus dataset.
citedBy
被引用
The subject concept is cited by the object essay or article.
composedOf
構成要素
The subject whole (a framework concept or quadrant) is composed of the object parts, ordered where the graph uses a list.
contrastsWith
対比対象
The subject line is deliberately contrasted with the object prior-art work to sharpen its own positioning.
counteredBy
対抗策
The subject failure-pattern concept is countered by the object ADR's decision.
covariesWith
共変する
The subject axis co-varies with the object axis: the inversion axes move together and cannot be adopted independently. Symmetric; stated in both directions.
definedBy
定義文書
The subject term's authoritative definition lives in the object document (an ADR or spec file).
definesConcept
概念を定義する
The subject (a practice line or working doctrine) holds definitional authority over the object Concept.
derivedFrom
素材由来
The subject ADR's source material is the object essay — prose provenance for a decision. Contrast derivesFrom, which links formal artifacts (DOI records, repositories) by lineage.
derivesFrom
系譜上の由来
The subject work (a line, paper, skill repo, or concept) descends from the object work — its judgments or content were extracted from the object's practice and re-expressed. Objects are formal artifacts (DOI records, repositories); contrast derivedFrom.
downstreamOf
下流に位置する
The subject layer or concept is downstream of the object: it inherits the object's premises and is constrained by them.
embodiesAxiom
公理を体現する
The subject (an ADR or retrieval view) embodies the object contemplative axiom in concrete design.
enforcementLocus
強制の所在
The object ADR is the locus where deterministic enforcement of the subject concept lives.
evaluatedBy
評価手段
The subject's claims are evaluated against the object benchmark or method.
extends
拡張する
The subject builds on the object without replacing it — an ecosystem repo extending its line, an ADR extending an earlier ADR, or a sub-quadrant extending its parent quadrant.
gatedBy
承認ゲート
Writes to the subject memory layer or concept pass through the human-approval gate the object ADR defines.
groundedIn
根拠
The subject is intellectually grounded in the object — an external reference or one of the program's own ADRs.
groupedAs
グループ所属
The subject ADR belongs to the object named ADR group.
harvestedFrom
収穫元
The subject corpus repository harvests its source material from the object line or content repository.
hasFailureMode
失敗モード
The subject concept has the object concept as its named failure mode.
implementedBy
実装文書
The subject concept is implemented by the object ADR's decision.
implements
実装する
The subject operationalizes the object concept or cycle phase.
independentOf
直交する
The subject phase is orthogonal to the object quadrant — the phase distinction applies in every quadrant.
instantiatedBy
実例化される
The subject concept, layer, or ADR is given concrete instances in the object ADR, document, or repository.
isComplementOf
補完関係
The subject working doctrine complements the object work — same territory, different role.
lensOver
レンズ対象
The subject retrieval view is a lens over the object memory layer.
manifestsIn
顕在化先
The subject concept manifests concretely in the object quadrant.
mappedToFrameworkIn
フレームワーク対応文書
The subject ADR is mapped to an external policy framework in the object policy-mapping document.
observedBy
観測記録
The subject concept is empirically observed in the object ADR's recorded result.
operationalizes
運用化する
The subject repository operationalizes the object concept as a running artifact.
pairedWith
対をなす
The subject and object form a deliberate complementary pair. Symmetric; stated in both directions.
partOf
部分である
The subject phase is a part of the object whole (e.g. the six-phase loop).
partiallySupersededBy
部分的に置換される
Parts of the subject ADR are superseded by the object ADR; the rest remains in force.
producedBy
生成元コマンド
The subject artifact is produced by the object distill command. Inverse of produces; both directions are stated explicitly.
produces
生成する
The subject distill command produces the object memory layer or artifact.
provenByAnchor
アンカーによる証明
The subject existence-proof instance is proven by the object anchor artifact (a DOI record or repository).
realizedBy
実現文書
The subject phase or prohibition level is realized in practice by the object ADR.
recordedIn
記録文書
The subject's authoritative prose record lives in the object document or file.
referencedBy
参照元
The subject external reference is cited by the object ADR or repository.
siblingOf
兄弟ライン
Peer relationship between practice lines. Deliberately the only inter-line edge at hub level — no dependsOn edge type exists, encoding sibling-not-dependency at the schema level.
strongerThan
より強い
The subject prohibition level is structurally stronger than the object level; chains the hierarchy absence > scaffolding > untrusted boundary.
structuralResponseBy
構造的応答
The subject concept receives its structural response in the object ADR.
supersededBy
置換される
The subject ADR has been fully replaced by the object ADR. Inverse of supersedes; both directions are stated explicitly because JSON-LD consumers do not infer inverses.
supersedes
置換する
The subject ADR fully replaces the object ADR, which is no longer in force.
triggersDecision
判断を誘発する
Reaching the subject phase triggers the object decision concept.
vocabularyDisjoint
語彙の非交差
The subject and object lines share a headword whose meanings are deliberately disjoint, guarding against conflation (Authorship Strategy and AAP both use "attribution"). Symmetric; stated in both directions.
withdrawnBy
撤回される
The subject ADR was withdrawn by the object ADR.
attributionGap
帰属ギャップ有無
Boolean: whether work routed to the subject quadrant produces an attribution gap (true only for the Autonomous Agentic Loop).
axisPosition
軸位置
Integer position of the subject axis in the three-axis inversion's canonical ordering.
epistemicStatus
認識ステータス
Free-text epistemic status of the subject concept (e.g. hypothesis under test), keeping the graph's claims honest.
governanceTier
ガバナンス層
The governance intensity the subject quadrant demands: out-of-scope, medium, or high.
layerOrdinal
レイヤー順序
Integer position of the subject layer in the four-layer framework, counted from the top.
level
レベル
Integer ordinal of the subject within its ordered set (memory layers, prohibition levels).
lineStatus
ライン昇格ステータス
Free-text status of the subject working doctrine relative to line promotion.
namingStatus
命名ステータス
Free-text record of the subject's naming decision (suspended, confirmed, collision-checked).
narrativePosition
読解順序
Integer reading-order position of the subject essay within a line's narrative sequence.
order
順序
Integer position of the subject phase in Contemplative Agent's six-phase cycle.
ordinal
順序数
Integer position of the subject phase in AKC's six-phase loop.
shapeOrdinal
形状順序
Integer ordering position of the subject doctrine shape.
snapshotKind
スナップショット種別
A snapshot kind enumerated by the subject taxonomy node (distill, distill-identity, insight, amend-constitution).
xAxis
横軸値
The subject quadrant's horizontal-axis value: deterministic or semantic-judgment.
yAxis
縦軸値
The subject quadrant's vertical-axis value: pre-defined-workflow or exploratory.
Bidirectional growth loop running Research, Extract, Curate, Promote, Measure, Maintain. Each phase binds to one composable skill. The cycle stays stable even as individual skills evolve.
AKC's stacked architecture: principles (ADRs), patterns (design-pattern skills), implementation (composable skills). Separating layers decouples rate of change so principles stay stable while implementations evolve independently.
Property that explicit AKC skills can be dropped once the cycle has been internalized. The skills are scaffolding, not the goal. Dissolution is the intended end state, not a fallback.
Mindfulness, emptiness, non-duality, boundless care. Behavioral preset adopted from Laukkonen et al. (2025) that shifts alignment from external instruction toward internal disposition.
Security posture in which risky capabilities (shell execution, arbitrary URL access, filesystem traversal) are not restricted by rules because the corresponding code was never written. The attack surface is absent rather than guarded, avoiding rule-bypass vulnerabilities.
AAP's diagnostic frame for routing work to the architecture that preserves attribution: Script, Algorithmic Search, LLM Workflow, Autonomous Agentic Loop.
AAP's ordering of prohibition mechanisms by structural strength: absence > scaffolding enforcement > untrusted boundary. The strongest prohibition is the one that requires no enforcement because the capability does not exist.
Authorship Strategy's structural claim that twentieth-century authorship and AI-era authorship invert on three co-varying axes: value source (scarcity to diffusion), validation mechanism (exclusivity to derivation), network effect (enclosure to openness). The axes are not independent; a strategy mixing axes is internally inconsistent.
Authorship Strategy's operational judgment stack: Authenticity (the value protected), Attribution Diffusion (the strategy), Idea vs Scaffold (the prediction), Tactics (the concrete decisions). Each layer is downstream of the layer above.
Authorship Strategy's three ADRs forming a tactical discipline: Concept DOI as Canonical Reference (ADR-0001), DOI Federation via .zenodo.json (ADR-0002), Cross-Platform Dataset Federation (ADR-0003). Together they make a DOI-registered artifact's citation network recoverable from metadata alone.
Authorship Strategy's structural decision (ADR-0006) that any framework-governed artifact deploys two complementary structured entry points — a prose-form navigator (e.g., an llms.txt convention file) and a concept-form linked-data graph (e.g., a JSON-LD knowledge graph) — released synchronously. Each entry point addresses a distinct LLM-mediated reader sub-population the other cannot reach. The pair is the operational embodiment of the enclosure-to-openness axis on the ingest surface.
Authorship Strategy's structural decision (ADR-0013) that a content-derived intrinsic identifier — a SWHID, computed from an artifact and its version history and verifiable from the content alone without any registry — complements the extrinsic concept DOI rather than replacing it. The two layers cover each other's failure mode: if the DOI registry disappears the intrinsic identifier still verifies, and if the content is lost the DOI record still cites. It extends the identifier-federation triplet, and for artifact genres where DOI registration is impractical it serves as the substitute priority-claim mechanism. Archival in a content-addressed software archive also opens a parametric-channel ingest surface for code-focused training corpora.
Attention, Not Self's comparative frame across the three major Buddhist Abhidharma traditions: Theravāda, Sarvāstivāda, Yogācāra. Each tradition supplies a distinct cognitive-process model whose terms (citta-vīthi, samanantara-pratyaya, ālaya-vijñāna, etc.) are juxtaposed with computational phenomenology constructs.
Attention, Not Self's core thesis: the perspective that attention — its allocation, its precision-weighting, its momentariness — is the operative unit of cognition, while the apparent self is a derivative pattern (anātman). The thesis grounds the comparative move between Abhidharma's cognitive-process classification and contemporary computational phenomenology.
Hub-level through-line of the three agent-design lines: the engineered agent harness extends past tools, permissions, and evals up to its topmost layers — norms, constitutions, and values — and those layers are governed by the same human-gated cycle as every layer below (promotion gates, behavioral measurement, scaffold dissolution). Concretely, the rules and context files that normally hold task regulation (coding conventions, security policy, writing style) also carry value norms, so the AI is designed as a companion in long-term value judgment rather than only a task optimizer. Operational, not merely declarative: a constitution that is only declared is configuration; one that is promoted, measured, and audited is engineered. Defined at hub level because it spans lines; the hub graph holds definitional authority.