Agent Attribution Practice (エージェント帰責実践)

Research-line name · Agent Attribution Practice · also known as AAP

Ten harness-neutral judgments (ADRs) on accountability distribution in autonomous AI agents, paired with the four Business AI Quadrants as a diagnostic frame for routing work to the architecture that preserves attribution. In this line, attribution means accountability for action — who answers when an agent's behavior causes harm — a sense disjoint from the credit-for-source sense used in the Authorship Strategy line. The judgments were extracted from Contemplative Agent's operational practice and re-expressed stripped of project identifiers.

Coined by Tatsuya Shimomoto (shimo4228) as the name of the Agent Attribution Practice research line.

Canonical sources

FAQ

What is Agent Attribution Practice?

Ten harness-neutral ADRs on accountability distribution in autonomous AI agents, paired with the four Business AI Quadrants as a diagnostic frame — attribution here meaning accountability for action, not credit for source.

Who coined the name Agent Attribution Practice?

Tatsuya Shimomoto (shimo4228), as the name of the AAP research line.

Where is the canonical source?

The agent-attribution-practice repository (https://github.com/shimo4228/agent-attribution-practice), archived under concept DOI 10.5281/zenodo.19652013.

Related terms

エージェント帰責実践(日本語)

自律 AI エージェントにおける accountability distribution (責任の分配) についての、harness-neutral な 10 の判断 (ADR)。attribution を保つアーキテクチャへ仕事を routing する診断フレームとして four Business AI Quadrants と対になる。このラインでの attribution は accountability for action (エージェントの行動が害を生んだとき誰が答えるか) を意味し、Authorship Strategy ラインの credit for source の意味とは disjoint である。判断群は Contemplative Agent の運用実践から抽出され、プロジェクト固有識別子を剥がして再表現された。